The untimely submission of evidence for the exercise of rights arising from transactions subject to VAT

ECJ, 2 March 2023, C-664/21, Nec Plus Ultra Cosmetics AG and Republika Slovenija

Authors

  • Yohan Andres Campos Martinez Universidad de Castilla-la Mancha (ES)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-3583/18159

Keywords:

Tax evidence, abuse of rights, principle of neutrality, exemptions, input VAT refund and deduction

Abstract

The legal systems of the Member States of the European Union have developed a system of “onus probandi” at tax level which is based on a series of rules in which the procedural elements appear to be fundamental as opposed to the material elements through which a tax reality can be verified. However, VAT, with the technical particularities that characterise it and its high level of harmonisation at European level, presents certain mechanisms within which, in certain cases, the evidential requirements at a material level tend to prevail over the procedural elements with the aim of achieving the neutrality of the tax. In the decision under study, the CJEU assesses whether it is possible to refuse the application of VAT exemptions and deductions when the evidence necessary for the exercise of these rights is submitted untimely. To do so, it considers it necessary to analyse this possibility from the perspective of the principles of neutrality, proportionality and effectiveness of the procedural measures applied.

References

ALONSO ORTEGA, J. M. (2016): “El «onus probandi» en los procedimientos tributarios”, Revista Quincena Fiscal, No. 18, Aranzadi.

CALVO VERGÉZ, J. (2016): “El ejercicio del derecho a la deducción del IVA soportado en las operaciones de fraudes Carrusel”, Revista Aranzadi Unión Europea, No.5, Aranzadi.

GARCÍA-CUERVA GARCÍA, S. (2007): “Las reglas generales del onus probandi”, en LLUCH, X. A. y PICÓ I JUNOY, J. (Dirs.), Objeto y Carga de la Prueba Civil, Bosh Editores.

GÓMEZ ARAGÓN, D. (2020): “IVA 2020: tres nuevos requisitos relativos a la exención de las entregas intracomunitarias de bienes”, Carta Tributaria, Revista de Opinión, No. 60, 1 de marzo, Wolters Kluwer.

LUCHENA MOZO, G.M. (2022): “Impuesto sobre el Valor Añadido”, en COLLADO YURRITA, M.A. Y ROMERO FLOR, L.M. (Dirs), Manual de Casos Prácticos de Derecho Financiero y Tributario, Atelier.

PÉREZ NIETO, R. (2011): “La carga de la prueba en los procedimientos y procesos tributarios”, Tribuna Fiscal: Revista Tributaria y Financiera, No. 252, Ciss Praxis, WoltersKluwer.

SLOWINSKI, K. P. (2022): “Los principios de neutralidad y proporcionalidad como vectores del derecho de deducción en el impuesto sobre el valor añadido. Una revisión crítica al hilo de la sentencia del tribunal de justicia de la unión europea de 18 de marzo de 2021 (asunto c-895/19)”, Revista Crónica Tributaria, No. 183, IEF.

Published

2023-10-03

How to Cite

Campos Martinez, Y. A. (2022). The untimely submission of evidence for the exercise of rights arising from transactions subject to VAT: ECJ, 2 March 2023, C-664/21, Nec Plus Ultra Cosmetics AG and Republika Slovenija. Studi Tributari Europei, 12(1), II.141 - II.151. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-3583/18159

Issue

Section

News and commentary